State ex rel. Burroughs v. Ohio Hwy. Patrol Retirement Sys. Bd. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Appellee, Jeffrey A. Burroughs, sought a writ of mandamus in the Tenth District Court of Appeals to compel appellants, the Ohio Highway Patrol Retirement System Board and the Ohio Highway Patrol Retirement System (collectively, “the board”), to vacate their termination of his disability benefits and pay him the benefits he would have received had it not been for the termination. The Tenth District granted a limited writ and ordered the board to conduct a “physical-capacity evaluation” of Burroughs.
{¶ 2} Because we conclude that the board had no legal duty to conduct a physical-capacity…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel Pipoly v. State Teachers Retirement Sys.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Nese v. State Teachers Retirement Bd. of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- Northwestern Ohio Building & Construction Trades Council v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Cydrus v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Northwestern Ohio Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Heilman v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024
- State ex rel. Heilman v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024
- State ex rel. Seabolt v. State Hwy. Patrol Retirement Sys.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018