Legal Opinion

Gill v. Waggoner

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 21, 1992No. 11128-8-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Roy K. Gill was a passenger in a vehicle which was rear-ended by an insured driver of California State Automobile Association (CSAA). Mr. Gill demanded $37,156 from CSAA to settle his claim for the neck and back injuries suffered in the accident. CSAA offered $35,000. Mr. Gill accepted. A few days later, CSAA told him there had been a mistake and attempted to withdraw the offer. Mr. Gill brought this action to enforce the agreement. The court granted Mr. Gill's motion for summary judgment. CSAA appeals. We affirm.

Factual Background

Mr. Gill was a passenger in a vehicle rear-ended by a CSAA…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Phillips v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Barrie v. Hosts of America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Meaney v. DoddWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Reese v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Simonson v. FendellWashington Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. David Lee Willis v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, and Rogers County Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. Oregon Mut. Ins. Co. v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Oregon Mutual Insurance v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Nelson v. McGoldrickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. William L. FLEMING, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MONUMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; Monumental General Insurance Group, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API