Legal Opinion

Stephens v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 17, 1986No. 39-85LPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This is a suit for compensation for the alleged taking of an avigation easement in the airspace over plaintiffs’ property. Plaintiffs’ claim is founded upon the fifth amendment to the Constitution of the United States. They allege that their property has been taken without due process of law and without just compensation. The specific basis for plaintiffs’ claim is that defendant “inversely” condemned an easement across their land through persistent low overflights of jet aircraft. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (1982).

Upon consideration of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Grace E. Avery v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  5. Batten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Persyn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  2. Carole v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  3. Argent v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Last Chance Development Partnership v. KeanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. Brenner v. New Richmond Regional Airport CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API