Legal Opinion

Tessendorf v. Lasater

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 15, 1900No. 686PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Pottawatomie district court; Vm. Thomson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mahan, P. J. :

The plaintiffs in error sought to enjoin the negotiation or transfer of a promissory note given by them to Lasater and Post, which had been deposited with the defendant bank as collateral security to an antecedent debt, without indorsement.

The petition charges deceit and fraud by a misrepresentation of the facts concerning the transaction out of which the note grew.

August Tessendorf held the deed of the Union Pacific Railway Company for a tract of land assumed to be a part of its grant, but for which it had never obtained a patent.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Union Bank of Georgetown v. GearySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. McClure v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Honeyman v. JarvisIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Keefe v. VogleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  5. Lapham v. HeadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kiefer Oil & Gas Co. v. McDougalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  2. Murray v. WhiteMontana Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API