Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. Superior Court
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1981No. 15206PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
We accepted this petition for special action pursuant to Article 6, § 5 of the Arizona Constitution and Rule 1, Rules of Procedure for Special Actions, 17A A.R.S., because this is a matter of state-wide importance and there is no equal, plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal.
We must answer only one question: Is the public sexual indecency act, A.R.S. § 13-1403(A), void for vagueness and therefore unconstitutional?
The facts necessary for a determination of this matter are as follows. The real party in interest and respondent, Michael C. Boyle, was identified by three…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- State v. VarelaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. LocksArizona Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- State v. SandovalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- State v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- State v. MalottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.