Legal Opinion

Empiregas, Inc., of Gadsden v. Geary

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 1, 1983No. 81-866PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case requires us to examine the type of conduct constituting the tort of outrageous conduct, and to ascertain whether plaintiff produced evidence sufficient to avoid a directed verdict on certain claims submitted to the jury.

Plaintiff Pamela Geary sued defendant Empiregas after that company failed to return an LP gas regulator it had removed from her tank. These claims went to the jury: (1) breach of contract; (2) conversion; (3) fraud; (4) negligence and wantonness; and (5) outrageous conduct. Empiregas moved for directed verdicts separately and severally on each count at the end of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Road Serv. Co. v. InmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Ott v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Russell-Vaughn Ford, Inc. v. RouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Ex Parte NixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Peddycoart v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Carl M. Limbaugh v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Whitt v. HulseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Boykin v. Magnolia Bay, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Covington v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Goolesby v. KOCH FARMS, LLC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API