Legal Opinion

Council on American-Islamic Relations California v. Blinken

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 26, 2022No. 2:22-cv-01500Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC No. 2:22-cv-01500-TLN-KJN RELATIONS, CALIFORNIA, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER v. 14 ANTONY BLINKEN, in his official 15 capacity as U.S. Secretary of State, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Council on American-Islamic Relations, 19 California, Council on American-Islamic Relations, Sacramento Valley/Central California, and 20 approximately 159 Iranian FY-2022 diversity visa selectees and their derivatives (collectively, 21 “Plaintiffs”)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Tom Doherty Associates, Inc. D/B/A Tor Books v. Saban Entertainment, Inc. And Saban International N.V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API