Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1937 Model Studebaker Sedan Automobile

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1938No. 1616PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

The appellant (United States of America) instituted this proceeding under section 3450 of the Revised Statutes, 26 U.S. C.A. § 1441, for forfeiture of an appropriately described Studebaker automobile which had been seized by federal agents on the ground that it contained and concealed intoxicating liquor upon which the tax had not been paid, it being averred in the information that one George H. Morgan claimed some right, title, and interest in such automobile. After being permitted to intervene, said Morgan filed a motion to suppress all of the evidence taken and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Husty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Milam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  5. Kelley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. United States v. LernerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1940
  3. United States v. DuaneDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API