Boston & Maine Railroad v. D'Almeida
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Bill in equity, filed in the Superior Court on January 26, 1915, seeking to enjoin the defendant administrator from enforcing an alias execution issued against the plaintiff under the circumstances described in the opinion. The defendant demurred to the bill for want of equity. The demurrer was heard by Brown, J., and was sustained, and a decree was entered dismissing the bill with costs. The plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
This is an appeal from a final decree dismissing a bill of complaint brought by the Boston and Maine Railroad to enjoin Jayme M. D’AImeida and his attorneys from enforcing an alias execution for the uncollected balance of a judgment in favor of D’Almeida, entered on the verdict for $6,300 recovered by him in D’Almeida v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 209 Mass. 81.
It appears from the bill of complaint that after the rescript sent by this court pursuant to the opinion in D’Almeida v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 209 Mass. 81, the plaintiff in that case received $3,671.08 from the Boott Mills apart from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boott Mills v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Spaulding v. BackusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- City of Worcester v. Lakeside Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- d'Almeida v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Trustees of Amherst College v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nugent v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Noyes v. NoyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Hooker v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- D'Almeida v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.