Legal Opinion
D'Almeida v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 21, 1916PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
This was an action under St. 1907, c. 392, to recover a penalty for negligently causing the death of the plaintiff’s intestate. It came on for trial (1) with another action against this defendant brought to recover compensation for conscious suffering of the plaintiff’s intestate and (2) with an action against the Boott Mills brought (under St. 1909, c. 514, § 127, cl. 2; § 128,) both to recover a penalty for negligently causing the intestate’s death and damages for his conscious suffering. In the course of the trial a doubt occurred to the presiding judge * whether the plaintiff would be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boott Mills v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Stiff v. AshtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Jackson v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Lincoln v. GayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Fall River National Bank v. BuffintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McLearn v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Porter v. SorellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Nugent v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Pratt & Forrest Co. v. Strand Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Elfman v. GlaserMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.