Legal Opinion

Trower v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1907No. S.F. No. 3798PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Edward H. Stearns, and Albert H. Elliott, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

Plaintiff brings this action against the city and county of San Francisco upon fifty-eight assigned causes of action set forth in separate counts, the allegations of which are identical with the exception of the names, dates, and amounts. The first count is for the recovery of ninety dollars only, but the aggregate sum for which judgment is sought on all the counts in the complaint amounts to fifty-four hundred dollars.

The action involves certain fees alleged to have been demanded and collected by the county clerk of the city and county of San Francisco, and thereafter paid to the county…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fatjo v. PfisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Lewis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Malin v. County of LamoureNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Trower v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. B & B Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Campbell v. RaineyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API