Legal Opinion

B & B Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 25, 1937PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover back a sum of money heretofore paid by it to the defendant for water which the defendant, in the years 1930 and 1931, furnished and charged to a lessee of the plaintiff then occupying the plaintiff’s premises. The lease required the lessee to pay for water. Later the premises became vacant. In 1935, the plaintiff itself requested the defendant -to supply water to be consumed thereon. The defendant refused to do so unless the plaintiff should pay for the water formerly charged to the lessee. At that time any hen which the defendant may have had upon the land…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. City of Chicago v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Turner v. Revere Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Westlake & Button v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  5. City of Boston v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. South Puerto Rico Sugar Company Trading Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  2. Daley Construction Co. v. Planning Board of RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Brockton Power LLC v. City of BrocktonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  4. Rounds v. BD. OF WATER & SEWER COMMR. OF WILMINGTONMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. Carol City Utilities, Inc. v. MIAMI GARDENS SHOP. PLAZA, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API