Legal Opinion

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Arbogast

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 68-824PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSENBERG, District Judge.

A motion is here made by the defendant, Paul E. Arbogast, to dismiss the complaint filed by the plaintiff, Travelers Indemnity Company. The motion asserts that a West Virginia Court has already ruled that the plaintiff was not entitled to judgment against individual indemnitors and the motion to dismiss is here in order.

Counsel for both parties have indulged in an unauthorized contest through the means of briefs, supplemental briefs and second supplemental briefs. Counsel were never authorized to file other than original briefs and have arrogated an authority…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cora Hubbard Williams v. Cora Williams Murdoch and Commonwealth Bank and Trust Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  2. Frank Erickson and Amelia Erickson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Harold B. Wackerle and Evelyn Wackerle v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  4. Tornello v. Deligiannis Brothers, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  5. Scholla v. Scholla (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Perri v. DaggyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
  3. Danner v. MooreDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Kauffman v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API