Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Arbogast
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSENBERG, District Judge.
A motion is here made by the defendant, Paul E. Arbogast, to dismiss the complaint filed by the plaintiff, Travelers Indemnity Company. The motion asserts that a West Virginia Court has already ruled that the plaintiff was not entitled to judgment against individual indemnitors and the motion to dismiss is here in order.
Counsel for both parties have indulged in an unauthorized contest through the means of briefs, supplemental briefs and second supplemental briefs. Counsel were never authorized to file other than original briefs and have arrogated an authority…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cora Hubbard Williams v. Cora Williams Murdoch and Commonwealth Bank and Trust Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Frank Erickson and Amelia Erickson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Harold B. Wackerle and Evelyn Wackerle v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Tornello v. Deligiannis Brothers, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Scholla v. Scholla (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kauffman v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Perri v. DaggyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
- Danner v. MooreDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Kauffman v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970