(PC) Hill v. Prasad
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CYMEYON HILL, No. 2:21-cv-1727 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 DR. PRASAD, et al., FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a civil detainee, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Defendants’ fully 18 briefed motion for summary judgment is before the court. As discussed below, it is 19 recommended that the motion be granted. 20 Plaintiff’s Verified Complaint 21 Plaintiff alleges that on September 18, 2021, while housed at the California State Prison, 22 Sacramento…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.