Legal Opinion

Farrell v. DeClue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1963No. 31234, 31259PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOERNER, Commissioner.

These two appeals were taken by the plaintiff, in turn, from an order which by its terms granted defendants a new trial, and from a subsequent order amending the prior order. At its inception plaintiff’s action was a commonplace suit for damages claimed to have resulted from a collision between two motor vehicles. By the time the matter reached this court the issues ordinarily present in litigation of that character had virtually disappeared in an entanglement which may be aptly described as a legal Gordian knot.

Plaintiff’s petition was filed on November 24, 1961.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Casper v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Quinn v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Deeds v. FosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. Bussiere's Admisnistrator v. SaymanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. Crossland v. AdmireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Blue Cross Health Services, Inc. v. SauerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. City of Ferguson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Kansas City v. HoweMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Kollmeyer Ex Rel. Kollmeyer v. WillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Diekmann v. Associates Discount CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API