Legal Opinion
Maestas v. American Metal Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1933No. 3812PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BICKLEY, Justice.
Plaintiff (appellee), an employee of appellant American Metal Company, while in the course of his employment, on July 24, 1929, suffered an injury to 'his eyes, resulting from an accidental explosion.
Claim for compensation was filed November 9, 1931, which was answered by a denial and a plea that the claim was barred by the limitation contained in the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Comp. St. 1929, § 156-101 et seq.). Plaintiff then filed an “Amended Petition for Review and Modification of Award.” It is therein alleged that both of plaintiff’s eyes were injured by the explosion;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Watertown National Bank of Watertown v. BagleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Caton v. Gilliland Oil Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
- Sweeting v. Staten Island & Midland Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Board of Sup'rs of Jefferson County v. LessingMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Elsea v. Broome Furniture Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Ogletree v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Sanchez v. Bernalillo CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Wilson v. New Mexico Lumber & Timber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. CampbellAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.