Legal Opinion

Caton v. Gilliland Oil Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1928No. 3258PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WATSON, J.

Appellant’s claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act was adjudged against him upon the sole ground that it was not filed within the time prescribed by the statute, and was hence barred. He was injured May 29, 1925. He filed no claim until March 25, 1926.

Appellant states his proposition thus:

"The statutory bar does not run against the entire claim, but runs separately against each installment from 60 days after its maturity.”

The decision will be controlled by section 13 of the said act. Laws 1917, c. 83. So far as material, it provides:

“The compensation herein…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ogletree v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Vukovich v. St. Louis, Rocky Mountain Pacific Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Knippel v. Northern Communications, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. Kermac Nuclear Fuels Corp. v. LarrazoloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Taylor v. Am. Employers' Ins. Co. of Boston, Mass.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API