Legal Opinion

Molesworth v. State Ballot Law Commission

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 22, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

These two petitions challenge the correctness of a majority decision of the State Ballot Law Commission invalidating a petition for referendum to repeal St. 1963, c. 506, which provides for an increase in salary and expense allowances for members of the General Court. In Molesworth v. Secretary of the Commonwealth, 347 Mass. 47, an emergency preamble was adjudged sufficient to make the statute effective forthwith, and an order was entered directing the Secretary to take no further steps for a referendum on the statute as a nonemergency measure.

The first of the present cases is a petition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. State Ballot Law CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Lincoln v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Molesworth v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  4. Newman v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKenney v. Commission on Judicial ConductMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Hebert v. State Ballot Law CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API