Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McQueen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1955No. Appeals, 98, 99 and 100PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

The defendant was convicted after trial by jury of burglary and larceny. The only question before us is whether there was error in the charge of the court, particularly relating to alibi, which entitles him to a new trial. The Commonwealth contended that five boys, including the defendant, committed the offenses on the night of March 28, 1953. Two of the five boys said they did, and testified that the defendant participated in the crimes.

The defendant, who was not taken into custody until nearly four months after the offenses were committed, denied his guilt and said he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarnakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Commonwealth v. NobleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Commonwealth v. BarrishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Commonwealth v. MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Commonwealth v. LarueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. GarvinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. State v. ModeWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Halko v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  4. Greenhow v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API