Legal Opinion
Koppers United Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 11, 1943No. 8404, 8403, No. 8481PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDGERTON, Associate Justice.
These are petitions under § 24(a) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 1 to review an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Petitioners applied to the Commission for declarations of their status under §§ 2(a) (7) and 2(a) (8) of the Act. 2 Koppers United Company (Koppers United) asked the Commission to declare that Brooklyn Union Gas Company (Brooklyn) was not its subsidiary. Eastern Gas and Fuel Associates (Eastern) asked to be declared not a subsidiary of Koppers Company. Koppers Company (not Koppers United Company) asked to be declared…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- General Motors Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Central & South West Utilities Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- ICC v. Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Pennaluna & Company, Inc., Benjamin A. Harrison, and Harry F. Magnuson v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Randolph Phillips v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944