Legal Opinion

Essington v. Monroe County Transit Authority

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01878Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT = Wy, Fi = MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA $ cs Ba . Ei □□□□ foe Se . PEp cP 15 SEAN ESSINGTON, Administrator | | MAS “20 of the Estate of DAVID . ORR □ ESSINGTON, deceased, oO □□ □□ Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-ev-01878 Vv. ... |(SAPORITO,. M.J.) MONROE COUNTYTRANSIT AUTHORITY, etal. - Defendants. oo □□ AMENDED MEMORANDUM This is a federal: civil rights action, brought by the plaintiff pursuant to 42. U.S.C. § 1983. In addition to a § 1983 claim against. defendant Monroe County Transit Authority (“MCTA’), the plaintiff has brought related state-law claims…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API