Legal Opinion
United States v. Stephen A. Knox
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 15, 1992No. 92-7089PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
COWEN, Circuit Judge.
The principal question presented by this appeal is whether videotapes that focus on the genitalia and pubic area of minor females constitute an “exhibition of the genitals or pubic area” under the federal child pornography laws, 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2), (4) (Supp.1990); 18 U.S.C. § 2256(2)(E) (1988), even though these body parts are covered by clothing. We hold that such visual depictions qualify as an exhibition, and that this construction does not render the statute unconstitutionally overbroad. Finally, we conclude that the government presented…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Stephen A. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Andrew M. Harvey, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Margaret Neely, Forest Bailey, Steve Johnson, Cornell Stokes, and Ben IsraelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Arbitration Between United Industrial Workers, Service, Transportation, Professional Government v. Government of the Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Scott HaywardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.