Legal Opinion

United States v. Stephen A. Knox

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 9, 1994No. 92-7089PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COWEN, Circuit Judge.

The principal question presented by this appeal is whether videotapes that focus on the genitalia and pubic area of minor females constitute a “lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area” under the federal child pornography laws, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252(a)(2), (4) and 2256(2)(E) (1988 & Supp. IV 1992), even though these body parts are covered by clothing. When this case first came before us, we held that such visual depictions do qualify as lascivious exhibitions and that this interpretation does not render the statute unconstitutionally overbroad.…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Gerard HornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. AmiraultCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. BrunetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. FrabizioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. RoderickCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API