Legal Opinion

Kransdorf v. Murray (In Re Fidelity America Financial Corp.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1982No. 19-00039PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:

The issue before the court is whether the demand for a jury trial by one of the defendants in this case should be granted. We conclude that the defendant is not entitled to a jury trial because the instant complaint is in the nature of a request for an accounting and for a turnover of property of the estate and, consequently, even under the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, is a proceeding which is triable by the bankruptcy court without a jury.

The question before us arises as a result of the demand by Realty General Associates, Ltd. (“Realty”), one…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Cline v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Slack v. HavensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baldwin-United Corp. v. Thompson (In Re Baldwin-United Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
  2. Franklin Computer Corp. v. Harry Strauss & Sons, Inc. (In Re Franklin Computer Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. McLouth Steel Corp. v. Marblehead Lime Co. (In Re McLouth Steel Corp.)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
  4. Interfirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. Basin Refining, Inc. (In Re Basin Refining, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1983
  5. Masto v. Coast Trading Co. (In Re Coast Trading Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API