Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Association v. Stenson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2014No. 2013-1308PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, David Edmund Stenson of Dayton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0042671, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1989. In October 2012, relator, Dayton Bar Association, charged Stenson with six violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct for preparing and filing a frivolous pro se complaint on behalf of a client, dismissing that complaint without the client’s informed consent, and neglecting another client’s legal matter.

{¶2} The parties entered into stipulated findings of fact and misconduct in which Stenson agreed that he had committed the violations alleged in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. DrainOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. ShulerOhio Supreme Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. StensonOhio Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API