Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Rudie

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

A person named Mayme Dietzler died seized of land in the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of section 30, township 27 north, range 16 east, Shawano county. To pay debts and administration expenses the north 100 feet of this parcel was sold by one Vandree, a real-estate broker employed by the executor of Dietzler’s will, to one Rosenberg. The residue of the tract was assigned by final judgment in probate to defendant Rudie (then known as Soufal) under the description:

“The north 370 feet of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter, section 30, township…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. ChloupekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Cordes v. CoatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Abbott v. DowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. OsbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hajec v. NovitzkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lange v. AndrusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. United States v. Anthony J. Peters, Appeal of Walter F. Kelly and Sandra J. Hays, Forfeiture Purchasers-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Anthony J. Peters, Appeal of Walter F. Kelly and Sandra J. Hays, Forfeiture Purchasers-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API