DeJesus v. Flick
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Agosti, J.:
This appeal is from a final judgment pursuant to a jury verdict and a subsequent order denying a new trial. The jury awarded respondent $1,470,000.00, substantially more than she requested, in a personal injury action arising out of an altercation on a Las Vegas freeway. The primary question presented on appeal is whether misconduct by the plaintiffs attorney so permeated the *814proceedings that it improperly influenced the jury, thereby warranting a new trial under NRCP 59(a). We conclude that it did; therefore, we reverse the district court’s judgment and order…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. MoquinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Standard Oil Company of California v. Clyde A. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Pearl Kehr v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Incorporated Glenn Nordskog and Jim MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- McGuire v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Sipsas v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lioce v. CohenNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Ringle v. BrutonNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Grosjean v. Imperial Palace, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Clausell v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- Canterino v. the Mirage Casino-HotelNevada Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.