Legal Opinion

DeJesus v. Flick

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 2000No. 30158PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Agosti, J.:

This appeal is from a final judgment pursuant to a jury verdict and a subsequent order denying a new trial. The jury awarded respondent $1,470,000.00, substantially more than she requested, in a personal injury action arising out of an altercation on a Las Vegas freeway. The primary question presented on appeal is whether misconduct by the plaintiffs attorney so permeated the *814proceedings that it improperly influenced the jury, thereby warranting a new trial under NRCP 59(a). We conclude that it did; therefore, we reverse the district court’s judgment and order…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. MoquinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Standard Oil Company of California v. Clyde A. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. Pearl Kehr v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Incorporated Glenn Nordskog and Jim MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. McGuire v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Sipsas v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lioce v. CohenNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ringle v. BrutonNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Grosjean v. Imperial Palace, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Clausell v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Canterino v. the Mirage Casino-HotelNevada Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API