State v. Warsame
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
The state appeals the district court’s pretrial ruling that the victim’s statements to a police officer describing how appellant threatened her and inflicted her obviously fresh injuries were testimonial and therefore inadmissible at trial under Craivford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36,124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). Because we conclude that the district court erred in determining that the statements were testimonial, we reverse and remand to the district court for a determination of admissibility based on exceptions to the hearsay rule.
FACTS
Eden Prairie police…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hammon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Lopez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MacLinTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. WarsameSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. WarsameCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. WarsameSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007