State v. Warsame
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
On appeal from a pretrial order denying in large part the state’s motion to admit statements an alleged victim made to police, this court reversed the district court’s Confrontation Clause ruling and remanded for a determination of whether the statements were admissible under the hearsay rules. State v. Warsame, 701 N.W.2d 305, 307 (Minn.App.2005), review denied (Minn. Oct. 26, 2005). After the Minnesota Supreme Court denied review, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated this court’s opinion, and remanded for consideration in light of Davis v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. AmosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WarsameSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. WarsameSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007