Care & Protection of Marina
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Although the petitioner and his counsel participated in the initial stage of the underlying care and protection proceeding, the petitioner has apparently not participated in any of the numerous later sessions, including those pertaining to the subsequent request of the Department of Social Services (department) to dispense with parental consent to adoption. Counsel for the petitioner now protests that petitioner’s nonaction is not a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of his right to counsel. We need not. reach the question whether that is the appropriate standard in these…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Adoption of HollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Adoption of ImeldaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Adoption of RoryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- In re Adoption ZoshaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
- In re Adoption of VanceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018