Legal Opinion

Care & Protection of Marina

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 4, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Although the petitioner and his counsel participated in the initial stage of the underlying care and protection proceeding, the petitioner has apparently not participated in any of the numerous later sessions, including those pertaining to the subsequent request of the Department of Social Services (department) to dispense with parental consent to adoption. Counsel for the petitioner now protests that petitioner’s nonaction is not a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of his right to counsel. We need not. reach the question whether that is the appropriate standard in these…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adoption of HollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Adoption of ImeldaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  3. Adoption of RoryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  4. In re Adoption ZoshaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
  5. In re Adoption of VanceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API