Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Scott v. United States Steel Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 27, 1973No. 72 C 2503PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
McMILLEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed a complaint to restrain the defendant from discharging waste water into Lake Michigan at defendant’s Waukegan (Ill.) Works. The complaint consists of three counts, each of which seeks the same relief on different legal theories. Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss each count on various grounds and asking for oral argument. The parties have filed briefs which present the legal issues clearly, hence no oral argument is necessary. The Motion to Dismiss will be denied.
Count I is filed by both of the plaintiff governments under…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Isbrandtsen Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Georgia v. Tennesssee Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- City of Evansville, Indiana v. Kentucky Liquid Recycling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Reserve Mining Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Stream Pollution Control Board of the State of Indiana, and Zarko Sekerez, Proposed Intervenor v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Rohm & Haas Company and Rohm & Haas of Texas, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Parsell v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.