Legal Opinion
Blockbuster Entertainment Group v. Laylco, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 23, 1994No. 94-72173PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
EDMUNDS, District Judge.'
At a hearing on September 8 and October 21, 1994, this matter came before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is granted.
I. Facts
Plaintiff Blockbuster Entertainment Group, a division of Viacom, Inc. (“Blockbuster”), is an entertainment company and the world’s leading home video rental company. Blockbuster’s retail operations include approximately 2,700 company-owned and 900 franchise-owned stores. Approximately 105 of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Doe Lang, Petitioner/defendant-Appellant v. Retirement Living Publishing Co., Inc., Respondent/plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Citibank, N.A. And Citicorp v. Citytrust and Citytrust Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Frisch's Restaurant, Inc. v. Shoney's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Clt Logistics v. River West BrandsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Marketing Displays, Inc. v. TrafFix Devices, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Sports Authority, Inc. v. Abercrombie & Fitch, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Hair Associates, Inc. v. National Hair Replacement Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.