Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Pena

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 2016No. WR-84,073-01PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Per curiam.'

This is an application for a writ of habe-as corpus. Tex. Code CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. Applicant pleaded guilty to delivery of a controlled substance and was sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. Tex. Heai/th & Safety Code §■ 481.112(f). He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his guilty plea was involuntary and the State failed to disclose evidence in violation -of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). We filed and set his application for submission and directed the parties to brief whether: “(1) the misconduct in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Ex Parte SimpsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Ex parte WhisenantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex parte ValdezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Ex parte SpeckmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Ex parte BrownlowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2019
  4. Ex parte ColoneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2019
  5. Pena, MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API