Ex Parte Simpson
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
COCHRAN, J.,
delivered the order for a unanimous court.
Applicant presents thirty-seven allegations, including a claim of mental retardation, in his original application for habeas corpus relief in this death-penalty capital-murder case. The trial judge entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that relief be denied. We have reviewed the record, and we adopt the trial judge’s findings and conclusions. Therefore, we deny relief. We also dismiss applicant’s “Motion to Consider Additional Evidence of Mental Retardation” because that supplemental material was improperly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Ex Parte BrisenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Ex Parte HarringtonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Harris, RoderickCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Ex Parte BriggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Flores, Ex Parte GerardoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Ex Parte Van AlstyneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.