Legal Opinion

Ex parte Speckman

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 20, 2017No. WR-81,947-02PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · AlcalaAlcala, J.

In this opinion, we explain our rationale for denying a motion to dismiss-filed by Steve Herbert Speckman, applicant. Applicant's motion seeks dismissal of his Article 11.07 habeas application at a late stage in the proceedings after the habeas court has made findings of fact and conclusions of law recommending that relief be denied, and he seeks that dismissal without prejudice so that he may later refile his application. In response to applicant’s motion, this Court filed and set this case , to set forth general guidelines for resolving late-stage motions to dismiss without…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TorresCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Epps v. FowlerTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Perez, Ex Parte Alberto GironCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  4. Smith, Al LetroyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  5. Ex Parte RieckCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dyson, James AaronCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2021
  2. Ex Parte Jorge Luis Vazquez Perez v. ., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2024
  3. Ex Parte Kimberly Williams v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024
  4. Ex Parte: Bilal Muhammad v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2023
  5. Flowers, Elmo DewayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API