Berry v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
The defendant’s motion for summary judgment heretofore submitted is allowed.
A study of the pre-trial order, of the deposition of the plaintiff, and the exhibits introduced at the pre-trial leads to the conclusion that the relationship of employer and employee did not exist between plaintiff and the defendant. The injuries complained of by the plaintiff were sustained by him while he was in the employ of another whose relation to the defendant was that of an independent contractor. (See defendant’s pre-trial exhibit 6 and paragraphs 3-7 of pre-trial order). In this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Port of Palm Beach Dist. v. GoethalsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Heart of America Lumber Co. v. BeloveCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- C. T. C. Inv. Co. v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sapp v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
- American MacHine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Searle v. Great Northern Railway Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1960