Legal Opinion
C. T. C. Inv. Co. v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 27, 1940No. 7202PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGGLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, at one time the holder of certain real estate bonds, brought suit to recover damages, alleging breach of defendant’s contract guaranteeing payment of same. From the order allowing defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the pleadings, plaintiff appeals.
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was based upon the Amended Complaint filed on August 22, 1939, defendant’s Answer thereto, affidavits in support of and in opposition to such motion, and the answers of plaintiff to various interrogatories. From all of these the following appear to be the undisputed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commercial Nat. Bank v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- LeRoy State Bank v. J. Keenan's BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Sanders v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Maxwell v. CapehartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3Cited by3 opinions
- Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. WoodyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1942
- Berry v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Ry. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1942
- London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. DunerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943