Leucht v. Leucht
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 80. — ACTION BY MINNIE LEUCHT AGAINST BARBARA LEUCHT FOR ALIENATION OF HER HUSBAND’S AFFECTIONS. — October 8. Appeal from Kenton Circuit Court. W. McD. Shaw, Circuit Judge. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. — CLASSIFICATION UNDER RULE XVII. 1. The court erred in permitting the contradiction of appellant tin matters irrelevant and immaterial to the issue.
Read the full summary
CASE 80. — ACTION BY MINNIE LEUCHT AGAINST BARBARA LEUCHT FOR ALIENATION OF HER HUSBAND’S AFFECTIONS. — October 8. Appeal from Kenton Circuit Court. W. McD. Shaw, Circuit Judge. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. — CLASSIFICATION UNDER RULE XVII. 1. The court erred in permitting the contradiction of appellant tin matters irrelevant and immaterial to the issue. (Kennedy v. Commonwealth, 14 Bush, 357; Loving v. Commonwealth, 30 Ky., 651.) 2. The court erred in refusing to admit proof of the divorce proceeding instituted by the husband against his wife. 3. The court erred in admitting…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Carroll —
Affirming.
This is an action by appellant, who was plaintiff below, tó recover damages for the alienation of her husband’s affections by the appellee, defendant below, who was his mother. There was a judgment in favor of appellee upon the verdict of a jury who found in her behalf.
A reversal is asked for alleged errors of the court in admitting and rejecting evidence. The rulings chiefly complained of are, first, the exclusion of evidence offered by appellant relating to statements made *705made by tbe husband of appellant in the absence of other persons, which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SappCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
- Shipp v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Shepherd v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- Commonwealth v. EversonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Manhattan Life Ins. v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Luick v. ArendsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Coles v. HarschOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Beddow's Adm'r v. Barbourville Water, Ice & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Gorder v. SimsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Willey v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.