Legal Opinion

People v. Russell

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1926No. Docket No. 1343PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The district attorney filed an information against the defendant, charging him with having violated the provisions of section 288 of the Penal Code. The defendant entered a plea of not guilty and a trial was had before the trial court sitting with a jury. The jury returned a verdict of guilty. The defendant made a motion for a new trial, but his motion was denied. A judgment based on. the verdict was entered and the defendant has appealed from the judgment and order.

The offense, it is claimed, was committed at a small house or shack at Seventy-seventh Avenue and East Fourteenth Street in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. People v. DelucchiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HurlburtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. People v. ManchettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Jones v. BayleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Eye v. Kafer, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API