Mastick v. Thorp
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The defendant appealed from an order denying his motion to dissolve a preliminary injunction which had been granted at the commencement of the action. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sanderson, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to dissolve an injunction. The motion was made on the complaint and answer unaccompanied by any affidavits upon either side.
The action was brought to restrain the defendant by injunction from enforcing, by execution or otherwise, a certain judgment which he had obtained in an action of ejectment against the plaintiffs’ grantors, and to open and set the same aside, or in other words to obtain a new trial in that action.
The facts, as detailed in the complaint, are substantially as follows:
*446An action was brought by the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Brum v. IvinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Boston v. HaynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Ex Parte GunterAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
- National Bank of the Republic v. HapgoodUtah Supreme Court · 1893
- Dunlap v. SteereCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.