Dunlap v. Steere
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1DissentMcFarland, J.
I dissent, and concur in the opinion of Commissioner Vanclief, prepared in Department, a copy of which is hereto attached; and I desire to say further, that, in my opinion, there is no sufficient evidence to support the latter part of the following finding of the court: “And the said John Steere was not then the owner of the said property, nor any part thereof, and had no right, title, or interest of any sort therein, all of which he well knew.” In Steere’s complaint in the original action, he first averred ownership and possession of the land, and afterwards also averred adverse possession…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Ligare v. California Southern RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Perkins v. WakehamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Zellerbach v. AllenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.