Legal Opinion

Peck v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1885No. 11,808PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

The appellant brought this suit against the, appellee to recover the possession of lots Nos. 1, 2 and 3,, in the town of Fulton, which are now in the town of Linwood, in Tippecanoe county, Indiana. The complaint was in the statutory form.

The defendant answered by a general denial. There was a finding by the court for the defendant. A motion for a new trial by the plaintiff, alleging that the finding was contrary to the law and to the evidence, was overruled. Judgment was rendered on the finding, and the plaintiff appealed. He assigns as error the overruling of his motion for-a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Prather v. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Douglass v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Woollen v. WishmierIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Prather v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harris v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Sherlock v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Muncie Electric Light Co. v. JoliffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Gardner v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API