Doyle v. Bi-State Development Agency
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SNYDER, Judge.
The defendant, Bi-State Development Agency, appeals from the trial court’s order granting plaintiff a new trial after a jury verdict for defendant in an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when she fell while preparing to alight from defendant’s bus. The judgment is affirmed.
The trial court’s order granting a new trial was based upon the trial court’s conclusion that appellant’s converse instruction was erroneous because it did not correspond to the language of respondent’s verdict-directing instruction. The converse instruction used the undefined term…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bayne v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Oventrop v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Brewer v. Swift & CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Frogge v. Nyquist Plumbing and Ditching CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Payne v. St. Louis Grain Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kindle v. KeeneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. MertzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Steinlage v. MarchettoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983