Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Pape
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 17, 2005No. SC04-40, SC04-41PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
918 So.2d 240 (2005)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
John Robert PAPE, Respondent.
The Florida Bar, Complainant,
v.
Marc Andrew Chandler, Respondent.
Nos. SC04-40, SC04-41.
Supreme Court of Florida.
November 17, 2005.
Barry S. Richard and M. Hope Keating of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tallahassee, FL, for Complainant.
John Robert Pape and Marc Andrew Chandler, Pro se, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Respondents.
PARIENTE, C.J.
In this case we impose discipline on two attorneys for their use of television advertising devices that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct. These devices, which invoke the breed of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In re R. M. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re RMJSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Harrell v. the Florida BarCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Tracey v. SoleskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- In Re Amendments to Rules Reg. Bar-AdvertisingSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- The Florida Bar v. GoldSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- The Florida Bar v. HinesSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.