Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Hines

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 10, 2010No. SC08-2297PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a referee’s report recommending that respondent, Shari Nicole Hines, be found not guilty of professional misconduct. The Bar seeks review and asserts that Hines should be subject to a rehabilitative suspension. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

As more fully explained below, we disapprove the referee’s recommendation that Hines be found not guilty of violating Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-5.3(b), governing a lawyer’s responsibilities with respect to nonlawyers associated with a lawyer. That rule provides that the lawyer must make reasonable efforts to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. PapeSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. The Florida Bar v. JoySupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. The Florida Bar v. CosnowSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. FLORIDA SO. ABSTRACT & TITLE CO. v. BjellosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Askew v. Allstate Title & Abstract Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. Jose Carlos MarreroSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  2. Denton v. Good Way Oil 902 Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. The Florida Bar v. Randall Lawrence GilbertSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  4. In Re: Amendments to Rule Regulating The Florida Bar - Rule 3-6.1Supreme Court of Florida · 2020
  5. In Re: Amendments to Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 5-1.1(g)Supreme Court of Florida · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API