Legal Opinion

Altermatt v. Altermatt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 1, 1953No. 35,943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission affirming the findings of a referee awarding Leo Altermatt workmen’s compensation benefits. The referee found a compensable employer-employee relationship between relator and claimant and that claimant suffered accidental injuries which arose out of and in the course of his employment. The questions presented here appear to be three: (1) Was claimant an “employee” of the relator? (2) Was he only a casual employee not engaged in the usual course of relator’s business? (3) Was there such a material deviation by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Colosimo v. GiacomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Nygaard v. Throndson BrothersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Chisholm v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. Workman v. EndrissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farnam v. Linden Hills Congregational ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Kolbeck v. MyhraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Berard v. LaCoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Huebner v. Farmers Cooperative Ass'n of HollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Farnam v. Linden Hills Congregational ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API