Legal Opinion

United States v. Gerald Tisdale and Kevin Middleton, Rudy Forman

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 4, 1999No. 1998PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant Kevin Middleton appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Miriam Goldman Ce-darbaum, Judge) entered July 14, 1998, convicting appellant, after a jury trial, of conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, and related counts. Appellant’s main argument on appeal is that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to move to suppress evidence obtained by the police during a raid on co-defendant Gerald Tisdale’s residence. 1

When premising an ineffectiveness claim on a suppression issue,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. United States v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Green v. City of Mount VernonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Lynch Ex Rel. Lynch v. City of Mount VernonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  3. Bancroft v. City of Mount VernonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  4. McColley v. County of RensselaerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. Deandre J. ScrogginsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API