Legal Opinion

Seabury Construction Corp. v. District Council of New York & Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 10, 2006No. 06 CIV. 2282(RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*195 OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

The respondent District Council of New York and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AEL-CIO (“District Council” or the “Respondent”), has moved to dismiss the petition of Seabury Construction Corp. (“Seabury” or the “Petitioner”) to stay arbitration sought by the District Council pursuant to § 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185. Seabury has cross-moved to enjoin arbitration. For the reasons set forth below, the motion of the District Council is granted, the cross-motion of Seabury is denied,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. In re the Arbitration between Waldron & GoddessNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seabury Const. v. Dist. Council Ny and VicinityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API