Seabury Construction Corp. v. District Council of New York & Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
*195 OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The respondent District Council of New York and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AEL-CIO (“District Council” or the “Respondent”), has moved to dismiss the petition of Seabury Construction Corp. (“Seabury” or the “Petitioner”) to stay arbitration sought by the District Council pursuant to § 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185. Seabury has cross-moved to enjoin arbitration. For the reasons set forth below, the motion of the District Council is granted, the cross-motion of Seabury is denied,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- In re the Arbitration between Waldron & GoddessNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Seabury Const. v. Dist. Council Ny and VicinityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006