Legal Opinion
Corneal v. Jackson Township
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 13, 2004No. 03-3587UnpublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
David and Sandra Corneal appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Jackson Township and various officials on claims for substantive due process and tortious interference with contract. Plaintiffs also argue that the district court erred in granting a motion to dismiss the Township solicitor from the case, and in the alternative, suggest that the court abused its discretion in denying leave to amend. We will affirm.
The parties are familiar with the facts and procedural history, which we will not recite except as necessary to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Delores Simmons, Administratrix of the Estate of Daniel La Friscoe Simmons v. The City of Philadelphia Police Officer A. Panati, Badge No. 2587Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Bituminous Materials, Inc. v. Rice County, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Triffin v. JanssenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Chesterfield Development Corp. v. City of ChesterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pappas v. City of LebanonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Burton v. Pennsylvania State PoliceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Giuliani v. Springfield TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Nieshe v. Concrete School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- E. Rockhill Twp. v. Richard E. Pierson Materials Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.