Triffin v. Janssen
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge.
This is a pro se appeal from an order granting appellees’, Continental Bank and Stephen D. Chopnick, motion for summary judgment and thereby dismissing appellant’s, Robert Triffin, second amended complaint as brought against appellees. Appellant presents the following questions for our review:(1) Whether, the trial court failed to ascertain that [appellant] set forth a viable and prima facia cause of action for the intentional interference with performance of a contract by a third person?(2) Whether, the trial [court] abused its discretion and misapplied the controlling law of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Creskoff v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- GLENN v. Point Park CollegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Yaindl v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. Standard Pump-Aldrich DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- O'NEILL v. Checker Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- ACUMED LLC v. Advanced Surgical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Strickland v. University of ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Phillips v. SeligSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Willard Buskirk v. Apollo Metals Pma Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Al Hamilton Contracting Co. v. CowderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.